Van Gundy Family Tree

Notes for Francis DOUGHTY

Residences & events:

1634 When Francis' father died, he was pastor of Old Sodbury, a few miles from Oldbury, with wife, Bridgett, and 3 children...Francis, Elias and Mary.

1636 Drawn into the fast growing puritan movement, the vicar came under the notice of the Anglican Church authorities and seems to have lost his pulpit in consequence.

1638 Boston, MA The family arrived in the New World. He went to New England where Puritanism was the force to be reckoned with.

Dorchester, near Boston, MA was where they settled for a time.

1639-1640 Taunton, MA. The ex-vicar became pastor of the newly settled town but his tenure was short. He fell into controversy with the extremists of his congregation over the matter of baptism, on which subject he held more liberal views than did the leaders of the New England brand of puritan thought.

1641 As a result of his convictions, he was removed from his pastorate.

RI The family moved and there the minister took part in organizing a new colonizing project, the purpose of which was to establish an English-speaking settlement on western Long Island, in the Dutch colony of New Netherlands.

Spring, 1642. A land grant was obtained for Mespat in the modern Borough of Brooklyn. There a new town was started and Rev. Doughty became the local pastor.

1643 An Indian uprising drove the barely settled settlers away, and the Doughty family fled to safety.

Manhattan, NY. At the Dutch capital, the minister found new friends, for there were many English residents among the Dutch.

Abt 1644 With the consent of the Dutch ministers the English organized a separate congregation, making Francis their pastor.

New Netherlands. The only church organization recognized in the Dutch colony was that of the Reformed church of the Netherlands. This English congregation was a unit of that body, met in the Dutch church building and its pastor drew his support from collections taken in his own and the Dutch congregations.

1645 Mespat, NY Rev. Doughty resumed the work of establishing a settlement.

1647 His settlement efforts were so successful that his former partners sued him in colonial court for a share in the property. The question seems to have been whether or not the partners' rights had lapsed by their abandonment of the effort in 1643. The court decided that their rights were still good, and when Doughty threatened to appeal the case to Dutch authorities in Europe, the colonial court fined him and issued a jail sentence of 24 hours as a warning against such action. Their persuasion seems to have been successful.

Spring 1647 Flushing, NY, a few miles from Mespat. The new English speaking settlement was organized with Doughty being chosen pastor of the new town. According to one authority, his pastorate began this same year.

1654 He sued the congregation for his salary in arrears, which had been contracted but unpaid to him.

In connection with his pastorate at Flushing, there has evolved the modern myth to the effect that Doughty was an early minister of the present-day Presbyterian Church. In England he had been an Anglican pastor, and in New England, he had, of necessity, been a Congregationalist. In New Netherlands he was minister of the Reformed Church of the Netherlands, a Presbyterian form of organization. In 1657 an ecclesiastical report on the condition of the colonial church was sent from Manhattan to Amsterdam, and the writers mentioned Doughty and another minister as having English-speaking congregations. Seeking words to explain that these ministers had affiliated with the established Reformed church, instead of clinging to the congregational policy of New England, the authors of the report stated that the pastors were Presbyterian. The modern misconception of his statement seems to have started with O'Callaghan, the historian of New Netherlands.

Fall 1655 Rev Doughty sailed for Virginia and theory has it that daughter Mary joined him after losing her property. They may have sailed together but both were out of the Dutch colony by August 1656. Whether or not Francis' wife was still alive at this time is not known. The older boys, Francis and Elias, were farmers on Long Island, where they remained and became prominent citizens. Son, Enoch went with his father to Virginia.

Hungar's Parish, Accomack Co, Va. Francis was next heard of as pastor of the Parish on the Eastern Shore. The Virginia church had been strictly Anglican up to 1652, when the colony submitted to parlimental authority. After that date the several parishes were left to go their own ways without interference by legislative acts of reform. Doughty went there, probably, in modified Anglicanism, having no surplice or Book of Common Prayer, but otherwise very much what it had been prior to 1652. Of his pastorate at Hungars, very little is recorded.

1655 It was said that he instigated a witchcraft prosecution.

1656 A parishioner mentioned him favorably in his will.

1660 Charles County, MD. Francis probably moved north to be nearer the family of second wife, Ann. The earliest reference to the presence of Rev. Doughty there was found in a bill of debt, a paper that in those days performed the function of the modern promissory note. The bill shows that in June 1660, the minister promised to pay George Short a certain amount of tobacco either at Pickawaxen in Charles County or at Potomac, on the Virginia side. About January or February of 1661, a Captain William Battin, who kept a store at Pickawaxen, summoned Mr. Doughty to county court, but the matter was adjusted and the case never came to trial.

Meanwhile, Francis had organized a church and was officiating as pastor. The earliest evidence of this is the suit of Joan Mitchell, filed in the summer of 1661, which called for trial in the court session of September. Earlier references show that Joan Mitchell had for some time been under popular suspicion of witchcraft, an allegation she stoutly denied. At this particular time the imputation had again been raised and, in self-defense, she brought suit against four persons, alleging slander. Her petition in the case shows that she felt that Mr. Doughty was shielding her enemies. "Whereas your poor petitioner is most shamfully used and her good name taken away from her she dowth desire that she may be righted and that shee may be searched by able women whether she bee such a person or no which those persons say I am and if I bee found to bee such a one I may bee punished by law or els to bee cleared by proclimation and that the worshipfull bench would take it into ther serious consideration how that I am abused and my good name taken from mee withoud disart and I most humbly desire your worships that I may have the law against them and I your poore petitioner shall bee bound to pray for you and yours. I desire YT Mr. Francis Doughty may bring those persons to light that have raised these scandalous reports of mee for hee says that I aslluted a woman at church and her teeth fell acking as if shee had bin mad and I desired him to tell mee who had raysed this report of mee and hee would not and so from one to another my good name is taken away that I cannot bee at quiet for them for it is allther delight and table talke how to doe mee a mischief being a poore distressed widow but my trust is in God that he will plead my case for mee and will never suffer the poor and innocent to perish by the hands of ther enemes for of a sunday as I was going to church with too of Capt. Fendalls folks Mr. Walker hurled stones at me as I was going a long and so hid hemself again which for any thing that I know his master might set him on to mischiefe mee and hee himself wrongs mee by word and I your petioioner shall be ever bound to pray for you."

The suit of Joan Mitchell against the minister went no further than the complaint. The trial was postponed to the November court and at that session the case was formally dismissed because neither party appeared.

9/1661 Another case that came before the court had some reference to ministerial work of Mr. Doughty. Eleanor Empson, widow of William Empson, was about to be married to John Morris. The pastor was to have performed the marriage ceremony, but he received a note forbidding the banns. Mrs. Empson brought suit against the supposed author of the note, alleging defamation, and called Enoch Doughty as her witness. Says the court record: "Mr. Enoch Doughty aged 22 years or thereabouts swore and examined in open court sayeth that he saw a note sent by Richard Watson to his father Mr. Francis Doughty to forbid the banns of matrimonie betweene Elenor Emmpson and any other person for that she was his wife before God this to the best of this depanants knowledge to bee the substance of the noat and further sayeth not." The supposed author of the note came into court and stated that, being a blind man, he had to trust in the fairness of others in the writing of his messages, and that he disclaimed any interest in the widow's matrimonial affairs.

There is nothing in the court records to indicate clearly the denominational character of Mr. Doughty's church. When the minister came from Virginia to Maryland, the English republic was still under under Cromwell’s rule, and Anglican worship was illegal. On May 5, 1660, the republican period ended with the reinstatement of the monarchy and parliament's order that henceforth all writs should be issued in the name of King Charles. With that act, the followers of the old worship services were free to return to some form of Anglicanism. Such was the situation when the Charles County church was formed, and, in all probability, the church was modeled after the modified Anglicanism of Virginia. It is at least certain that it adopted the vestry form of government so familiar in the Anglican system.

By 4/22/1662 Church papers show that Doughty had left the parish.

Spring 1662 Rappahannock Co, Va. Whether he left on his own or was dismissed is unknown but he returned to the south.

6/4/1662 The task of guarding his father's interests in MD fell to son Enoch. The absent minister sent a letter of attorney, prolix with legal verbiage, stating:

"Know all men by thees presant that I Francis Doughtie now minister of Rappahonnock county in Virginia doe authorise immpower and intrust my dearly loving sone Enock Doughtie of Charles countie in the Province of Mariland my trew and lawfull atturney....."

It may be noted that one of the 3 subscribing witnesses of this document was John Washington, one of the original Washington emigrants from England, and the ancestor of George Washington.

11/3/1665 The following, recorded in the Old Rappahannock county court papers, show Rev Doughty was Minister of both Sittingbourn and Farnham Parishes that lay on each side of the Rappahannock River at the lower end of Old Rappahannock County:

"We whose names are hereunder written being vestrymen for the parish of Sittingbourne and Farnham do here unanimously agree for the future maintenance of Mr. Francis Doughty the next two ensuing years and it is agreed upon as followeth: that Mr. Francis Doughty shall receive yearly of each parish above sd. Sixty pounds sterling to be paid in tobacco according to act of Assembly the said tobacco to be paid in caske without salery or other charge to the afore said Mr. Doughty revoking and disannullingal former orders bargaines and contracts whatsoever made by and between the said Mr. Francis Doughty and both or either the respective vestrys of the parishes aforesaid to the true performance of which the said Mr. Doughty and the vestry of both parishes have hereunto set their hands this 3rd day of November, 1665."

The Reverend Doughty was popular with a large part of his congregation, but stirred others to great anger. Regardless, he must have been a vital person, for in the 5 years that he was there, he organized and revived the church work. In Sittingbourn Parish, he planned, bought land for, and erected churches, one near Cabin Point and one at the mouth of Occupacia Creek. He also built a church at Piscataway, and a church on the north side. At Farnham Parish, to which he gave half his time, he organized the vestry. While popular with the people, Francis was repeatedly unseated, either because of the control of the church by the state, or because of the vagaries of his own personality. He was accused of censuring his parishioners conduct, and of refusing to administer the sacrament of communion on Easter Sunday. For this he was tried, his accusers being not only vestrymen, but also justices of the court. This charge made it impossible for Francis to not be convicted. The trial aroused much interest, and grew largely out of the quarrel over whether he should be paid in sterling or in tobacco. It preceded by more than a hundred years the famous "Parson's case", which has been made famous by the fiery eloquence of Patrick Henry. At the outcome of the trial, Francis was "put out" as minister of the parish.

After that, and coupled with his rising disillusion with Virginia, he wrote a deed of intent, in which he made provisions for the upkeep of his wife, Anne, "in consideration of the good will, affection and love that I bear unto" her. He remarked that she did not wish to "bid farewell to her more dear and beloved children", and so wished to remain in Va. With this action , The Reverend Francis Doughty disappeared from the pages of history, his final destination and place of death unknown.

The "Glebe" may be the original home that Francis shared with Anne Graves Cotton Eaton Doughty at Hungar's Parish, in Accomack Co. The building is very old, but it is not known if it is the original or not.

The original courthouse in Accomack Co, Va, is now used as a county museum. Accomack has the oldest courthouse still in existance in the United States. The museum contains a paper thin linen garment, worn by the "first rectors of Hungar's Parish", but there is no actual date for the robe, so it is unknown if Francis wore it or not.

Copyright 2010 by BJ Van Gundy

Page built by Gedpage Version 2.21 ©2009 on 06 May 2010